Cases 501 - 510 of 5,676
Walden et al v. Shire et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Antonina Walden and Scott Walden
Defendant:
Hashi Shire, AJ Logistics, LLC and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stiles v. USA
as 3:2022cv00115
Petitioner:
Robert Carlton Stiles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. USA
as 3:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
Lornell Centrell Mitchell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Garmoo v. USA
as 1:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Mario R. Garmoo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thomas v. Sayler
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Allen Charles Thomas
Respondent:
Warden James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wohlganger v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jessica Marie Wohlganger
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Olson v. Queen City Pizza, LLC
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Thomas Olson
Defendant:
Queen City Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. ConocoPhillips Company
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
John Davis
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.