Cases 51 - 60 of 28,527
Hoang v. Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02564
Plaintiff:
Ha T. Hoang
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Devenney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Wendy Sune Devenney
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Demers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Shelly R. Demers
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Haro v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Haro
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
(SS) Millner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Brian Adrian Millner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Coleene P. C. v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03458
Plaintiff:
Coleen P. C.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Powers Dumapit v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05316
Plaintiff:
Louise Powers Dumapit
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Denise Carroll v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03410
Plaintiff:
Denise Carroll
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Manuel Navar Diaz v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03412
Plaintiff:
Manuel Navar Diaz
Defendant:
Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzalez v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02482
Plaintiff:
Teresa Marie Gonzalez
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
