Cases 51 - 60 of 218
Walker v. Langford et al
as 1:2021cv01524
Defendant:
Johnston, Langford and Lengerich
Plaintiff:
Arthur Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Getzel v. ATS Specialized, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01299
Plaintiff:
Juliet Getzel
Defendant:
Anderson Trucking Service, Inc., a/k/a ATS, Inc., Arthur Carroll, III, ATS Specialized, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osterhout v. TCF Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00403
Defendant:
Barbara J. Mahone, Ronald A. Klein, David T. Provost and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Osterhout
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Vanluven-Malloy v. Correctional Medical Group Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03198
Defendant:
Jamie (I) Miller, Tammy Garrett, Shauri Kron and others
Plaintiff:
Holly Vanluven-Malloy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faircloth v. CDOC et al
as 1:2020cv03202
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Faircloth
Defendant:
Jason Lengerich, Maul, Dean Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alarcon v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv02620
Plaintiff:
Arthur Michael Alarcon
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company doing business as Progressive and Horace Mann Service Corporation doing business as Horace Mann Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Knapic et al
as 1:2020cv02179
Defendant:
Tresch and Knapic
Plaintiff:
Arthur Walker
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER FOR Arthur Walker, #61612
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Hooks v. Colorado Sprins Police Department
as 1:2020cv01947
Defendant:
Colorado Sprins Police Department and Colorado Springs Police Department
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
