Cases 51 - 60 of 324
Royster v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00464
Plaintiff:
Royster Vickie and Vickie Royster
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Giller v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv06195
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Vicki Giller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06469
Plaintiff:
Vicki L Hutton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruffer v. Global Telehealth Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02282
Defendant:
Thomas W. Swidarski, Vicky Tifft, Brian Battey and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Ruffer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Walburn et al v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2020cv04621
Plaintiff:
Chaz Lawson, Vicki P. Slone, James A Walburn and others
Defendant:
Clyde Dulin, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Bechtel Jacobs Co LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Local 4, AFL-CIO, and its Local 320, Ohio Association of Public School Employees, et al. v. Oregon City School District Board of Education
as 3:2020cv02186
Plaintiff:
Heather McGee, Amibeth Seman, Angela E. Hales and others
Defendant:
Oregon City School District Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burchett v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05385
Plaintiff:
Vicki Burchett
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03606
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vicky May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03919
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vickie Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jetter et al v. City of Cincinnati
as 1:2020cv00581
Plaintiff:
Alberta Harris, Dennis Howell, Cecil Howell and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
