Cases 51 - 60 of 1,408
Johnson v. El Dorado County Superior Court, et al.
as 23-4328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT KNOX JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
EL DORADO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DAVID L. DEVORE, MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Papa-Vicente v. State of Oregon
as 3:2023cv01934
Petitioner:
Duarte Papa-Vicente
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Fabian Duarte
as 23-3401
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FABIAN J. DUARTE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10668
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Alejandro Duarte v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv10658
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Duarte
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(PS) Johnson v. El Dorado County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv02843
Defendant:
Alling & Jillson, LTD, El Dorado County Superior Court, David L. DeVore and others
Plaintiff:
Kent Knox Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nancy Edith Duarte v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv10031
Plaintiff:
Nancy Edith Duarte
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Char v. Jefferson et al
as 1:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Defendant:
Michael Jefferson, Casey Irvine, Fia Duarte and others
Interested Party:
Litigation Coordinator, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rendon Duarte v. Garland
as 23-3598
Petitioner:
JOHN MARIO RENDON DUARTE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
