Cases 51 - 60 of 111
Pierce et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11895
Plaintiff:
Jamie Pierce and James Pierce
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11320
Plaintiff:
Nancy C. Pierce and Ronald J. Pierce
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv09567
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Pierce and Charles Thomas Pierce
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09356
Plaintiff:
Gloria Pierce and Donald M. Pierce
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08196
Plaintiff:
Karen Denise Pierce
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07687
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lynn Gist Pierce
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07514
Plaintiff:
Ruth Pierce and John A. Pierce
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gemcraft Homes, Inc. v. Morgan et al
as 3:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Gemcraft Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
George Morgan, Jr. , Michelle Morgan , David Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pierce v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv03379
Plaintiff:
Lela Pierce
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02709
Plaintiff:
Vicki Pierce and James Earl Pierce
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
