Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Ahmed v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2009cv11441
Plaintiff:
Abdul Razzaque Ahmed, M.D.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv40219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Advanced Technical Instructions, Inc. et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company
as 1:2008cv11931
Plaintiff:
Advanced Technical Instructions, Inc. and Alexander Ahmed Ishreitech
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Iratni v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv10871
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Sid Iratni
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ahmed v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv10735
Plaintiff:
Kawther Ahmed
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Choukri v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv10577
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Choukri
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
