Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Lythcott v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv04721
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Alphonso Lythcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moody v. USA
as 1:2016cv00472
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alphonso Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lester v. Keyser
as 1:2015cv09558
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Tyrone Lester
Defendant:
Superintendant Keyser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Samuels v. Wright et al
as 1:2015cv01442
Defendant:
Lucille Andrews, Steven Banks, Kathy Dros and others
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kirksey v. Lee
as 1:2014cv08265
Petitioner:
Alphonso Kirksey
Respondent:
Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Esperanza Ramirez et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2014cv04267
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Ramirez , Judy Murray , Robert Wyman and others
Defendant:
General Motors L.L.C. , General Motors Holding, LLC , Delphi Automotive PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02191
Defendant:
Joseph Bentivegna, City of New York, Naomi Hull and others
Plaintiff:
Tamata Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray v. New York State Division of Parole et al
as 1:2013cv07090
Defendant:
Detective Paul Bostic, Alphonso Camacho, A.C.S. Agent Lastarr Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter K. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowleg v. The United States Attorney et al
as 1:2013cv05866
Plaintiff:
Harry Alphonso Bowleg
Defendant:
The United States Attorney, The Director of F.B.I., The Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Dawkins v. Mucatel et al
as 1:2013cv02366
Plaintiff:
Donald Dawkins
Defendant:
Allan Mucatel, Donald Antonecchia, Jill St. John and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
