Cases 51 - 60 of 130
Gonzalez v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv02126
Petitioner:
Guadalupe Gonzalez
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Pavilion Construction NW LLC, et al
as 3:2015cv02114
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez Perez
Defendant:
P R Drywall LLC, Pavilion Construction NW LLC and Pavilion Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01607
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Peters
as 1:2015cv01476
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gonzalez-Aguilera
Defendant:
C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Gaytan
as 2:2015cv01416
Defendant:
Jacqueline Gaytan
Plaintiff:
David Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulton v. Koskinen et al
as 6:2015cv01359
Defendant:
L. Andrist, Ester E. Crawl-Bey, L. Glass and others
Plaintiff:
George Lyle Fulton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalez Perez et al v. Pavilion Construction NW LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00848
Defendant:
Jose Antonio Gonzalez, P R Drywall LLC, Pavilion Construction NW LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez Perez, Jose Luis Lopez Garcia and Juan Francisco Peregrina Silva
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalez v. Peters
as 2:2014cv02053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gonzalez
Defendant:
Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Martinez v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv01556
Petitioner:
Chris Gonzalez-Martinez
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
