Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EKWEM v. FENTY et al
as 1:2009cv01291
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTINE EKWEM
Defendant:
ADRIAN FENTY and CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
STEINBERG v. FENTY et al
as 1:2009cv01299
Plaintiff:
STEVEN STEINBERG
Defendant:
ADRIAN FENTY, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DENNIS L. RUBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Johnson v. Adrian Fenty, et al
as 09-5237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James F. Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Adrian Fenty, Mayor, Paul Alonzo Quander, Jr., Director, Court Services Supervision Agency, Paul Brennan, Supervisor, Court Services Supervision Agency and others
RUFFIN v. FENTY et al
as 1:2009cv01237
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RUFFIN, JR.
Defendant:
ADRIAN FENTY and MCCONAUGHEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adjeley Osekre v. Adrian Fenty, et al
as 09-7064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adjeley Ameng Osekre
Defendant - Appellee:
Adrian Fenty, Mayor DC Government and Office of Employee Appeals, Agency
A.G. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv01143
Plaintiff:
A.G., DANIEL GROSSE and VIVIAN CAVALIERI
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ADRIAN FENTY and MICHELLE A. RHEE
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
OSEKRE v. FENTY et al
as 1:2009cv01098
Plaintiff:
ADJELEY AMENG OSEKRE
Defendant:
ADRIAN FENTY and OFFICE OF EMPLOYEE APPEALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
