Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Vargas v. Bennet et al
as 1:2015cv00947
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vargas
Defendant:
Alexander Bennet , David Saiz , Eduardo Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tong v. Shapiro et al
as 2:2015cv00682
Plaintiff:
Tu My Tong
Defendant:
Alexander B Shapiro, McBee Dereck, Danna Schutte Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieto v. Burkhard et al
as 1:2014cv00373
Plaintiff:
Alexander Dean Nieto
Defendant:
Louis Burkhard , C. Espinoza , A. Montano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alexander-Econom v. Garcia et al
as 1:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Phillip Alexander-Econom
Defendant:
Zach Garcia , Barry Holfelder , David Maggio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alexander v. United States Post Office
as 1:2012cv00284
Plaintiff:
Chad Alexander
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2011cv00985
Plaintiff:
Chad Alexander
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona v. Mayflower Transit, LLC
as 6:2009cv01139
Plaintiff:
Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona
Defendant:
Mayflower Transit, LLC and Alexander Roy Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Brashar v. Board of Regents of The University of California et al
as 1:2009cv01040
Plaintiff:
Lynda R. Brashar
Defendant:
Board of Regents of The University of California, Los Alamos National Security, LLC, Hugh Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hernandez v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services et al
as 1:2009cv00918
Plaintiff:
Terry Hernandez
Defendant:
Presbyterian Healthcare Services and Lonnie Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
