Cases 51 - 60 of 170
Jones v. Cricchio, et al
as 1:2018cv00226
Plaintiff:
Willie James Jones
Defendant:
Mark Cricchio and Anthony Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Espinda et al
as 1:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Nolan P. Espinda, Department of Public Safety, Deputy Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Char v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Defendant:
Anthony Smith, Ashley Stibbard, Alan Lu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. CoreCivic et al
as 1:2018cv00134
Petitioner:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Respondent:
CoreCivic, CCA (Corrections Corporation of America), Saguaro Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferretti v. Maui Beach Club, Inc.
as 1:2018mc00057
Petitioner:
Anthony G. Ferretti
Respondent:
Maui Beach Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ferretti et al v. Beach Club Maui, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ferretti and Elaine Ferretti
Defendant:
Beach Club Maui, Inc., John Does 1-5, John Doe Corporations 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franchi v. Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00519
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Defendant:
Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc., Richard A. Jalkut, Scott K. Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00474
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paa v. CIT Bank, N.A., formerly known as ONEWEST BANK, FSB et al
as 1:2017cv00280
Plaintiff:
Teofilo Paa, Jr. and Anthony Paa
Defendant:
CIT Bank, N.A. , Federal National Mortgage Association , John R. Alm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
