Cases 51 - 60 of 169
Christensen v. Burnham et al
as 2:2018cv00143
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jeffrey Christensen
Defendant:
Bruce Burnham, Gretchen Nunnley, Ross Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Evans v. Lofgreen
as 2:2017cv01198
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Evans
Defendant:
Pamela Lofgreen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christensen v. Baithwaite et al
as 2:2017cv01123
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jeffrey Christensen
Defendant:
Robert Baithwaite, Brad Bown, Jeff Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scholte v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv01069
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scholte
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Christensen v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv00992
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jeffrey Christensen
Defendant:
Nate Taylor, Jim Wilberg, Daniel Mower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TFG-Massachusetts v. Metropolitan Linen Services et al
as 2:2017cv00895
Plaintiff:
TFG-Massachusetts
Defendant:
Metropolitan Linen Services, Anthony R. Gianci, Eric J. Gianci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disability Law Center et al v. State of Utah, The et al
as 2:2017cv00748
Plaintiff:
Disability Law Center , Katherine C. and Anthony M.
Defendant:
State of Utah, The , Utah Judicial Counsel and Utah Administrative Office of the Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Murphy v. Willmore et al
as 1:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charles Murphy
Defendant:
Thomas L. Willmore, Spencer Walsh, Barbara Lochmar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ello et al v. Brinton et al
as 2:2017mc00333
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Ello and Evelyn Ello
Defendant:
Gary R. Brinton and Seven Peaks Marketing Chicago
Movant:
Monica Brinton
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
