Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Webber v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Webber
Defendant:
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keller v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Clyde W. Keller
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Actavis, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jain et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01381
Plaintiff:
Deirdre Williamson Jain and Emily Ruth Williamson
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories and Hospira, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abbott Laboratories v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01499
Plaintiff:
Abbott Laboratories
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Cordis Corporation v. Lee, et al
as 1:2012cv00075
Interested Party:
Abbott Laboratories
Defendant:
Michelle Lee, United States Patent and Trademark Office and David J. Kappos
Plaintiff:
Cordis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Abbott Laboratories v. Cordis Corporation
as 1:2011mc00042
Movant:
Abbott Laboratories
Respondent:
Cordis Corporation
Cordis Corporation v. Kappos et al
as 1:2011cv00127
Plaintiff:
Cordis Corporation
Defendant:
David J. Kappos and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Intervenor:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
PBM Products, L.L.C. v. Abbott Laboratories
as 3:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
PBM Products, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: Diversity
United States of America, ex rel, et al v Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 1:2007cv00081
Plaintiff:
Meredith McCoyd, United States Of America, State Of Michigan and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Alaska, State of Kentucky, State of Kansas and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Omnicare Inc, Pharmerica Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
