Cases 51 - 60 of 163
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04729
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. The National Railroad Passenger Corporation d.b.a. Amtrak et al
as 4:2020cv03490
Defendant:
State of California, Alameda County, The National Railroad Passenger Corporation d.b.a. Amtrak and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00714
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Torres v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2020cv00425
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation individually and Doing business as Amtrak
Plaintiff:
Sandra Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jane Doe v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv02569
Defendant:
Does 1 through 25, Inclusive,, National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak, Jerron Rolen and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020at00067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Anderson v. Amtrak et al
as 3:2019cv08068
Defendant:
Doe Owner, Doe Employer, Doe Driver and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Green v. Amtrak Corporation
as 2:2019cv02207
Defendant:
Amtrak Corporation
Plaintiff:
Andrea Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carranza v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2019at01002
Plaintiff:
Maricela Carranza
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation Doing business as Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
