Cases 51 - 60 of 168
Cooney et al v. Rivera et al
as 1:2018cv03850
Defendant:
McCaren Park Mews, LLC, FirstService Residential, Inc., Board of Managers of McCaren Park Mews Condominium and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Cooney, Patrick Wade Cooney, Margot Cooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Papakhin
as 1:2018mc00086
Petitioner:
Anton G Papakhin
Cause Of Action: M 09-282 Attorney Change of Name
Anton et al v. Go Green Finish et al
as 7:2018cv01506
Plaintiff:
Pedro Anton and Ignacio Tlatelpa Calixto
Defendant:
Go Green Finish, E2F Properties, LLC, Joseph Indiviglio and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Day v. Cantellano et al
as 1:2018cv00629
Plaintiff:
Charles Roger Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Patricia Espinoza Cantellano, John S. Davis, Neil H. McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colbert v. Rio Tinto PLC et al
as 1:2017cv08169
Defendant:
Rio Tinto PLC, Rio Tinto Limited, Thomas Albanese and others
Plaintiff:
Anton Colbert
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Purisima v. New York City Transit Authority et al
as 1:2017cv07796
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
New York City Transit Authority, City of New York and Does 1 - 4000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Liverpool v. Cleveland et al
as 1:2017cv01995
Defendant:
Reggie Cleveland, Michael Merritt, JA Rampersant and others
Plaintiff:
Anton F. Liverpool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liverpool v. Cleveland et al
as 1:2017cv02244
Plaintiff:
Anton F. Liverpool
Defendant:
Reggie Cleveland, Michael Merritt, Reiman Edward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
