Cases 51 - 60 of 561
Bailey v. Truitt et al
as 1:2022cv06582
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Bailey
Defendant:
Warden Charles Truitt, Vicki Dunlap and F. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Truitt et al
as 1:2022cv06472
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Bailey
Defendant:
Charles Truitt, Vicki Dunlap and F. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. v. 1032062956 Store et al
as 1:2022cv05953
Plaintiff:
Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 1032062956 Store, 244 Home Life Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bailey v. Equifax Information Services LLC
as 1:2022cv05139
Plaintiff:
Bettie Catrice Bailey
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ocampo v. Wahl et al
as 1:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ocampo
Defendant:
A Wahl, . Strutmier, . Grobe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv50313
Plaintiff:
Taijay Todd
Defendant:
United States, Grisom and Megan Verry-Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Joiner et al
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Joseph Murphy
Defendant:
Katina L Joiner, Michelle Howell, . Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Wills
as 1:2022cv01255
Petitioner:
Theodore Bailey
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
