Cases 51 - 60 of 163
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC v. Cornish
as 2:2009at01705
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC and BR IP Holder LLC
Defendant:
Cassie Cornish
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Baskin Robbins Franchised Shops LLC et al v. Samsar Inc et al
as 8:2009cv01100
Plaintiff:
Baskin Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin Robbins Franchised Shops LLC and others
Defendant:
Samsar Inc, Zareen Husain and Ashfaq Husain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC et al v. Seung Y. Chong
as 2:2009cv06710
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, BR IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant:
Seung Y. Chong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC et al v. Comboz, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv13422
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant:
Comboz, LLC, Rav Group, LLC, Tazmania Donuts, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Tromboz, LLC, Ravindra Rao, Comboz, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, Dunkin' Donut Franchised Restaurants, LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Type:
Other Statutes
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. Church's Donuts and Candys Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03599
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC and others
Defendant:
Church's Donuts and Candys Inc., Kings Donuts and Icecream Inc., Corona Donuts and Ice Cream Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. Jaisrikar LLC et al
as 1:2009cv06402
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC and others
Defendant:
Jaisrikar LLC and Jaisrikar 2, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. Atlanta Royal Sweets, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01795
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC and others
Defendant:
Atlanta Royal Sweets, Inc., Atlanta Royal Sweets, Inc., SKS Ice Cream, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Atlanta Royal Sweets, Inc., Atlanta Royal Sweets, Inc., SKS Ice Cream, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Type:
Intellectual Property
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. Gopal Krishna LLC et al
as 4:2009cv00075
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC and others
Defendant:
Gopal Krishna LLC, Hare Krishna Investment LLC, Horizon Foods LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants, LLC et al v. Shiv Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv12494
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants, LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant:
Shiv Enterprises, Inc., Shiv Shakti Enterprises, Inc., Baldev Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Type:
Contract
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. AN & AT Food Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv02683
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC and others
Defendant:
AN & AT Food Corp., Delightful Food Corp., Unique Fast Service Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
