Cases 51 - 60 of 206
Zepeda v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Dee Dee Brookhart, Lori Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Mitchell W. Erwin, Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv01162
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Defendant:
D. Brookhart, Ethan McQueen, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gakuba v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
Mr. Peter Gakuba and Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and John Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Vipin K. Shah, Terry Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Shah et al
as 3:2022cv00938
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Vipin K. Shah, Terry Harris, Springer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2022cv02330
Plaintiff:
Jeryme Morgan
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Gomez et al
as 3:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Maurice S. Johnson
Defendant:
David Gomez, Graves, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gakuba v. Wampler et al
as 3:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
April Wampler, Michelle Neese, Areda Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomason v. Dallison et al
as 3:2022cv00834
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Thomason
Defendant:
Dallison, Sara Stover, Wexford Medical Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
