Cases 51 - 60 of 171
Shah El v. DeKalb County Clerk et al
as 3:2018cv50045
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
DeKalb County Clerk, Illinois DeKalb County Circuit Court, State Of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen v. Chicago State University Board of Trustees et al
as 1:2018cv00926
Plaintiff:
Sheron R Allen
Defendant:
Chicago State University Board of Trustees, Cecil B Lucy, Rachel Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. State Of Illinois
as 3:2017cv50366
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shaw
Defendant:
State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy et al v. Foster/Premier, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08114
Plaintiff:
John Murphy , Cecil Matthew and Nirupa Matthew
Defendant:
Foster/Premier, Inc., HomeWise Service Corp., Inc. and NextLevel Association Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cecil v. Miller and Steeno, P.C.
as 4:2017cv04160
Plaintiff:
Elisa Cecil
Defendant:
Miller and Steeno, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Minerly v. Holt et al
as 3:2017cv00520
Plaintiff:
Robert Minerly
Defendant:
Cecil Holt, Karen Kirschke, Denise Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ajibola v. Polley et al
as 3:2017cv03126
Plaintiff:
Oladapo Ajibola
Defendant:
Cecil E Polley, Keith A Clayton, Derek M Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Walsh et al
as 2:2017cv02070
Plaintiff:
Lillie Smith
Defendant:
Dan Walsh, Bryce Good, Justin Rzechula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv01381
Plaintiff:
Nolan Harvey , Scott Adams , Cecil Adkins and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Walsh et al
as 2:2016cv02364
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Jones
Defendant:
Dan Walsh, Arnold Mathews, Beth Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
