Cases 51 - 60 of 139
Christensen v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv00992
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jeffrey Christensen
Defendant:
Nate Taylor, Jim Wilberg, Daniel Mower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudder Holding Company et al v. Christensen et al
as 2:2017cv00678
Plaintiff:
Rudder Holding Company and Iceberg Franchising
Defendant:
F. Kelly Christensen , Anchor Holding Company , 4C Shake Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrews et al
as 2:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Thomas Edward Andrews and Scott Walter Christensen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Cox v. Christensen et al
as 2:2017cv00222
Plaintiff:
Shawn E. Cox
Defendant:
Clayton M. Christensen, Matthew Q. Christensen and Disruptive Innovation GP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christensen v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Bart Christensen
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
USA v. Christensen et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Curtis R. Christensen, Colleen Christensen, Founders Title and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Love et al v. Pineae Village Condominium Homeowners Association et al
as 1:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Mark Love and Jennifer Love
Defendant:
Pineae Village Condominium Homeowners Association, Ryan Christensen, Sam Feller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davenport v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Varlo Davenport
Defendant:
Richard Williams , Mark Houser , Don Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Stokes et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jeromy Jackson and Patricio Robison
Defendant:
FNU Stokes, FNU Stevenson, FNU Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01180
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
