Cases 51 - 60 of 505
Daronta Lewis v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 21-15663
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, S. SHERMAN, NIKKI JOHNSON, Transport officer, SATF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARONTA TYRONE LEWIS
(PC) Weems v. Clark et al
as 1:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Ken Clark and Kathleen Allison
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Weems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis Aguirre v. Clark Ducart, et al
as 21-15269
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, SCOTT KERNAN, S. BURRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS J. AGUIRRE
Defendant:
D. WELLS and D. WILCOX
Taylor v. Gipson et al
as 3:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, M. Voong and M. B. Atchley
Plaintiff:
Tracy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedro Honesto v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 21-55011
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1-100, CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, Director of the California Department of Corrections, in individual and official capacity and RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections, in individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO HONESTO, AKA Peter J. Honesto
(PC) Thompson v. Allison et al
as 1:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Christian Pfeiffer, Igbinoza and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Ray Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thompson v. Allison et al
as 2:2020cv02538
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Christian Pfeiffer, Igbinoza and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Ray Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Haygood v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv02346
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Ralph Diaz, Patrick Covello and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Haygood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pablo Matias v. Connie Gipson
as 20-17341
Petitioner / Appellant:
PABLO B. MATIAS
Respondent / Appellee:
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden
(PC) Howell v. Konrad et al
as 2:2020cv02389
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Jeff Lynch, A. Konrad and others
Plaintiff:
Kareen J. Howell and Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
