Cases 51 - 60 of 226
Owens v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv05038
Plaintiff:
Cari Owens
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morefield v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv05035
Plaintiff:
Remona Morefield
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cross v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04836
Plaintiff:
Vicki Ann Cross
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04821
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann Wilder
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byrd v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04835
Plaintiff:
Christine Byrd
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emerson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04833
Plaintiff:
Mary Emerson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thorpe v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04822
Plaintiff:
Tina Darlene Thorpe
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eddington v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04839
Plaintiff:
Rosalei May Eddington
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buie v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04838
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Darlene Buie
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04837
Plaintiff:
Connie L. Lane
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
