Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ACP GP, LLC v. PUTNAM COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv02697
Plaintiff:
ACP GP, LLC
Defendant:
PUTNAM COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , JERRY CUMMINGS , CINDY CUMMINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KARAM et al v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2016cv02472
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KARAM and AMANDA BOWERS
Defendant:
NICHOLAS BOWEN, KIRK COOKSEY, ALLEN CUMMINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WAGNER v. BRITTEN et al
as 2:2015cv02272
Plaintiff:
JACONDA WAGNER
Defendant:
THOMAS BRITTEN, JR., THOMAS BRITTEN, SR., JACQUELINE ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELPASSO v. FAIR LAWN INSPECTOR ART CUMMING BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN
as 2:2015cv00061
Plaintiff:
PHILIP BELPASSO
Defendant:
FAIR LAWN INSPECTOR ART CUMMING BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mathis et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv07882
Plaintiff:
Mary Mathis , Jose Paris , Russell Alexander and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILSON v. BOROUGH OF BELLMAWR et al
as 1:2013cv05437
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WILSON
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF BELLMAWR, BOROUGH OF BROOKLAWN, CHARLES HOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Bristol-Myers Squib Company et al
as 3:2013cv05313
Plaintiff:
Lynn Faye Banks , Barbara A. House , Mary E. McMillan and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
