Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Taylor v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Leonard M. Taylor
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, City of Wilmington, Wilmington Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mumin Rahim v. DE Bd Parole, et al
as 11-1599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUMIN RAHIM
Defendant - Appellee:
DE BD PAROLE, DWIGHT HOLDEN, Chairman, CARL C. DANBERG and others
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
Franklin Fennell v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 11-1483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN D. FENNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS C. CARROLL, IHOMA CHUCKS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
NURSE PRACTITIONER
Blake v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00146
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, City Of Wilmington, Wilmington Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
Joshua O. Lucas
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Aaron Goldstein and Carl C. Danberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Mary Moody, Carl C. Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnas Ortiz v. Joseph Biden, III, et al
as 11-1238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNAS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, III, ATTY GEN DE, CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, Dept. of Corrections and others
Stinson et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nevone Stinson
Defendant:
G. Williams , Allen Pedrick , R. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Williams , Allen Pedrick , R. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
