Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00043
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
646) 719-9434 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Johnson v. Groves Police Department et al
as 1:2011cv00090
Plaintiff:
Edwin James Johnson
Defendant:
Groves Police Department, UP Hinton, UP Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Woods et al
as 1:2010cv00712
Plaintiff:
Edwin James Johnson
Defendant:
Mitch Woods, Naphcare Medical Dept, FNU Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Freeman et al
as 3:2010xc01848
Intervenor:
James M Cassidy
Defendant:
Christopher Freeman and Robert Martin
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boyd v. Freeman et al
as 3:2010xc01849
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Boyd
Intervenor:
James M Cassidy
Defendant:
Christopher Freeman and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00111
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Lothian Cassidy LLC et al v. Ranson
as 7:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
731,895,886 LLC, Akberali Khakee Pension Plan, Anna Meisher Pension Plan and others
Defendant:
Bruce Ranson
Petitioner:
Spitzer Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Columbia v. Marquart et al
as 3:2009cv02025
Plaintiff:
Columbia Rodgers
Defendant:
Robert Marquart, Stephen McAdams, David Driskell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv00056
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv00030
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
