Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Rexer et al v. Cenlar FSB et al
as 4:2019cv01751
Plaintiff:
Dean Rexer and Kathy McCulloch
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB and State Farm F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medina et al v. Parkside Lending LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00109
Defendant:
Parkside Lending LLC, Cenlar FSB, Angela Zavala and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Paul Schmidt, Amber Brooke Schmidt Medina and Pamela Messer Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Champagne et al v. Cenlar FSB et al
as 1:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB, Albertelli Law and Amerihome Mortgage Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jason Champagne and Brandy Champagne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kuehnert et al v. Homebridge Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv04334
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., TXL Mortgage Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Katie Kuehnert and Excess Funds Online LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. Highlands Residential Mortgage Ltd et al
as 4:2018cv00865
Defendant:
Highlands Residential Mortgage Ltd and Cenlar FSB
Plaintiff:
Dora E. Lee
McMahan v. Mortgage Factory, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02020
Plaintiff:
James McMahan
Defendant:
Mortgage Factory, Inc., Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC , Cenlar FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Cenlar FSB
as 4:2017cv00846
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB
Plaintiff:
Victor Lee Garcia Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Piorecky v. Cenlar FSB et al
as 4:2017cv03207
Plaintiff:
Mark Piorecky
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB , ZB, National Association and Amegy Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lafleur, Jr. v. AmCap Mortgage, Ltd. et al
as 4:2017cv02999
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lafleur, Jr.
Defendant:
AmCap Mortgage, Ltd. and Cenlar, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
