Cases 51 - 60 of 175
Jacob Pitts v. Michael Downey, et al
as 20-2759
Defendant / Appellee:
JAKE JOHNSON, MICHAEL DOWNEY, Kankakee County Sheriff, CHAD KOLITWENZEW, Director of JCDC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB P. PITTS
Jacob Pitts v. Michael Downey, et al
as 20-2760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB P. PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORPORAL SENESAC, MICHAEL DOWNEY, Kankakee County Sheriff, TODD SCHLOENDORF, Correctional Officer and others
Jacob Pitts v. Michael Downey, et al
as 20-2761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB P. PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAKE JOHNSON, MICHAEL DOWNEY, Kankakee County Sheriff, TODD SCHLOENDORF, Correctional Officer and others
Ybarra v. Illinois et al
as 2:2020cv02241
Respondent:
Kathy Elliott-Bradshaw, Kankakee County Illinois and Chad Kolitwenzew
Petitioner:
Abraham John Ybarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jacob Pitts v. Michael Downey, et al
as 20-2358
Defendant / Appellee:
TREVOR TAYLOR, Correctional Officer, MICHAEL DOWNEY, Kankakee County Sheriff, CHAD KOLITWENZEW, Director of JCDC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB P. PITTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02243
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joaquin Herrera-Herrera v. Chad Kolitwenzew, et al
as 20-2319
Petitioner:
JOAQUIN HERRERA-HERRERA
Respondent:
CHAD KOLITWENZEW
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pitts v. Downey et al
as 2:2020cv02214
Defendant:
. Senesac, Chad Kolitwenzew, Michael Downey and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob P Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aleksey Ruderman v. Chad Kolitwenzew
as 20-2312
Petitioner:
ALEKSEY ARKADYEVICH RUDERMAN
Respondent:
CHAD KOLITWENZEW
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Delome Favi v. Chad Kolitwenzew
as 20-2372
Respondent:
CHAD KOLITWENZEW
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
DELOME O.J. FAVI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
