Cases 51 - 60 of 66
CHANDLER v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv04386
Plaintiff:
TINA CHANDLER
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHANDLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03768
Petitioner:
WALEAK CHANDLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chandler v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2015cv08641
Plaintiff:
Richard F. Chandler
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI U.S. SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHANDLER
as 1:2015cv08537
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRONELL CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502
PERRY v. DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY FAMILY PRESERVATION SERVICES et al
as 3:2015cv06923
Plaintiff:
CHALIA PERRY
Defendant:
DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY FAMILY PRESERVATION SERVICES, NONI KENDALL, MARY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CHANDLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv00153
Petitioner:
WALEAK CHANDLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STELTZ et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 2:2014cv02978
Plaintiff:
CARSON STELTZ , COREEN ALDOSA , STEVEN ALLAFI and others
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ED-GEL, LLC et al v. WELLS PHARMACY NETWORK, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv07292
Plaintiff:
ED-GEL, LLC and THOMAS JOHN HARKINS, JR.
Defendant:
WELLS PHARMACY NETWORK, LLC, WELLS PHARMA, INC., BURKLOW DEVELOPMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
