Cases 51 - 60 of 295
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66215
Plaintiff:
CLYDE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63505
Plaintiff:
CLYDE ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MERRILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62491
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CLYDE MERRILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benjamin v. United States of America
as 9:2021cv81889
Plaintiff:
Johnny Clyde Benjamin, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
COFFEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61542
Plaintiff:
CLYDE COFFEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ISOM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59225
Plaintiff:
CLYDE ISOM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTSON v. AEARO HOLDING LLC et al
as 7:2021cv56322
Plaintiff:
CLYDE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55625
Plaintiff:
CLYDE LEROY RAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Munzel v. Hillsborough County et al
as 8:2021cv02185
Plaintiff:
Clyde W. Munzel
Defendant:
Hillsborough County, Carmine Pisano and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REFFITT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46053
Plaintiff:
BRANTLY COLTON CLYDE REFFITT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
