Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Lewis v. Pfister et al
as 1:2012cv01455
Plaintiff:
James D Lewis
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Trancoso, Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Godinez et al
as 1:2012cv01456
Plaintiff:
James D Lewis
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Randy Pfister, . Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coffee v. Lewis et al
as 1:2012cv01416
Plaintiff:
Lazerrick Coffee
Defendant:
Edward D Lewis, Greg Kochell, . Tangman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Margie's Brands, Inc. et al v. Safeway, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07918
Plaintiff:
Margie's Brands, Inc. and Wilbur S. Reneau
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc., Tim Williams, Valerie D. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Godinez et al v. Lewis et al
as 1:2012cv07366
Plaintiff:
Gladys Godinez and Mario Reyna, Sr.
Defendant:
Kerry D. Lewis and E.L. Hollingsworth & Co.
Counter_claimant:
E.L. Hollingsworth & Co.
Counter_defendant:
Gladys Godinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Hicks et al
as 1:2012cv01107
Plaintiff:
Robert . Moore
Defendant:
Bryce W Hicks, Scott Hill, David A Lingle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
James D. Lewis
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Anita Alvarez, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NECA-IBEW Pension Trust Fund et al v. D Lewis Electric Inc
as 2:2010cv02241
Defendant:
D Lewis Electric Inc
Plaintiff:
NECA-IBEW Pension Trust Fund and NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
