Cases 51 - 60 of 2,733
LYLE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
EDWARD W. LYLE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
L. N., Jessica North Macie and Jani North Saale
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MOTEN v. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al.
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE C. MOTEN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RANDY GRIFFIN, COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MARK GRIFFIN
Defendant:
PAMELA SMITH, JOHN DOE and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
DABNEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
JOHN DABNEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and D.C. OFFICE OF TAX AND REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JERICA HARRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03611
Plaintiff:
JERICA HARRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00329
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
ARLIE SESSION and NO PARTY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
