Cases 51 - 60 of 104
WILLIAMS v. PEACH COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER et al
as 5:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
SAMMY LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ATTORNEY BOBBY BEARDEN, FORT VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE VETRMYER MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plummer v. Toliver et al
as 2:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Brunswick Newspaper, Bill Gates, Sgt. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sean Plummer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. WASHINGTON WILKES SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2021cv00167
Defendant:
DETECTIVE AMOS and WASHINGTON WILKES SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
SHAREAF GAMBAL BEY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
ESTES-ROBINSON v. ARNOLD et al
as 1:2021cv01623
Defendant:
DETECTIVE TIMOTHY KYLE ARNOLD and Acworth Police Department
Plaintiff:
YAHAAKOB MIYKAEL ESTES-ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTES-ROBINSON v. ARNOLD et al
as 5:2021cv00063
Defendant:
DETECTIVE TIMOTHY KYLE ARNOLD and ACWORTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
YAHAAKOB ESTES-ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballard v. Kesner
as 4:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Detective Melvin Kesner
Plaintiff:
Christin Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. JANUARY et al
as 5:2021cv00007
Defendant:
DETECTIVE EVERETT D JANUARY, DETECTIVE PHILLIP CARL VINSON and OFFICER SCOTT ROGERS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROOKS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 5:2021cv00004
Defendant:
DEFENSE ATTORNEY LARRY FOUCHE, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. City of Locust Grove et al
as 1:2020cv04906
Defendant:
Supervising Officer John Doe, Detective John Doe, City of Locust Grove and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence James Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrick v. City of Brunswick et al
as 2:2020cv00124
Defendant:
Detective Daniel Merritt and City of Brunswick
Plaintiff:
Dante G. Fredrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
