Cases 51 - 60 of 11,057
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00117
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Smith
as 3:2024cv01631
Petitioner:
Samuel Lyn Reaves
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Kevin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Muniz et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Christopher Gene Henderson
Respondent:
Senior Warden David Muniz and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. TDCJ
as 2:2024cv00595
Petitioner:
Corey Brandon Morrison
Respondent:
TDCJ and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brantley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01599
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarty v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00736
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Allan Michael McCarty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morriss v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Christopher W. Morriss
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Frank Alonzo Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Frank Alonzo Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
Lutheran D. Gordon
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
