Cases 51 - 60 of 2,902
Taylor v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor and Kennado Kinte Taylor
Defendant:
John Doe, Gonzalez, Sgt Bogdala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cepress et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Tiron Washington
Defendant:
Timothy Cepress, Eric Kukowski, Lorn Anschutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Kristen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe, Jane et al v. Prairie du Chien Memorial Hospital Association, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Jane Roe
Defendant:
Prairie du Chien Memorial Hospital Association, Inc. doing business as Crossing Rivers Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Davenport v. Klang et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Rodney Klang, Rebecca Tervonen, Sgt Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
McDougal v. Aramark Correctional Food Service Staff et al
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Freddie James McDougal, Jr
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Food Service Staff, Jane and John Does, Starke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
