Cases 51 - 60 of 602
Brant v. Schneider National Inc et al
as 1:2020cv01049
Defendant:
Schneider National Inc, Schneider Finance Inc, Schneider National Carriers Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eric R Brant, Thomas Campbell and Brian Minor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
John Warren, et al v. USA, et al
as 23-16029
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DAVID WARREN, individually and as Guardians Ad litem and Next Friends of their minor children, D.G.W., A.J.W., J.D.W. III and A.A.W and LAURA WARREN, individually and as Guardians Ad litem and Next Friends of their minor children, D.G.W., A.J.W., J.D.W. III and A.A.W.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a Domestic Nonprofit Corporation
Defendant:
KAPIOLANI MEDICAL SPECIALISTS, a Domestic Tax Exempt Organization, DEVIN PUAPONG, M.D., HAWAII PACIFIC HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., a Domestic Nonprofit Corporation and others
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv04605
Counter Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cross Claimant:
Colin Clarke, M.D.
Defendant:
Colin Clarke MD P.C., Svetlana Kovaleva a/k/a Melana Kay, Medical Evaluation Services & Billing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Apple Chiropractic of NY, P.C. et al
as 1:2023cv05075
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Apple Chiropractic of NY, P.C., Tristate Chiropractic of SI, P.C., Dr. Riotto Chiropractic, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Korge Products Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv05053
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation and others
Defendant:
Korge Products Corp., Marta Medical Supply Inc., Oleksandr Zubchenko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Edwards et al v. PJ Ops Idaho, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00283
Defendant:
Tom Wylie, PJ Ops Idaho, LLC, Papa John's International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Edwards, James Hollingsworth, John Carrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Tristate Psychological Injury Services, P.C. et al
as 1:2023cv04091
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Tristate Psychological Injury Services, P.C., Scott Lloyd, Ph.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), Scott Lloyd, Ph.D and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rebecca Smith, et al v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., et al
as 23-2369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rebecca Smith, on her own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Cristine M. Ghanim, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UnitedHealth Group Inc., United HealthCare Services, Inc., United Healthcare Insurance Company and others
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. MC Physical Therapy, P.C. et al
as 1:2023cv03536
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
MC Physical Therapy, P.C., Michelle Nesas Cuarda, P.T., Raine M. Pesidas Physical Therapy, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Midro et al v. Longs Drug Stores California, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Bryan Midro and Rochelle Midro
Defendant:
Longs Drug Stores California L.L.C. doing business as Longs Drugs #9275, Doe Defendants 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10 and others
Cross Claimant:
Odom Corporation (The)
Cross Defendant:
Longs Drug Stores California L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
