Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Oquendo v. MacEachern
as 1:2010cv11216
Plaintiff: Carlos Oquendo
Respondent: Duane J. MacEachern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Copeland v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv11215
Petitioner: Jamall Copeland
Respondent: Massachusetts Department of Correction and Duane MacEachern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKinney v. MacEachern
as 1:2010cv10791
Petitioner: Christopher McKinney
Respondent: Duane MacEachern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopes v. MacEachern
as 1:2010cv10766
Petitioner: Suzito Lopes
Respondent: Duane MacEachern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guerrero v. MacEachern
as 1:2010cv10747
Petitioner: Miguel Guerrero
Respondent: Duane MacEachern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martone v. MacEachern We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv10368
Petitioner: Mark Martone
Respondent: Duane MacEachern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopes v. MacEachern We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv10195
Petitioner: Danilo Lopes
Respondent: Duane MacEachern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. MacEachern et al
as 1:2009cv11646
Petitioner: Steven A. Johnson
Respondent: Duane MacEachern, David Brody and Edward F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cloutman v. Clarke et al
as 1:2009cv11375
Plaintiff: Michael Cloutman
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Marlene Dodge, Dyana Nicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lutz v. MacEachern We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv11301
Petitioner: Wayne Lutz
Respondent: Duane MacEachern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?