Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Dortch v. Terrell
as 0:2008cv01047
Petitioner:
Lester Dortch
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Terrell
as 0:2008cv00837
Petitioner:
James Ward
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morrison v. Terrell
as 0:2008cv00665
Petitioner:
Robert L Morrison
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Leon-Ganel v. Terrell et al
as 0:2008cv00544
Petitioner:
Sergio Leon-Ganel
Respondent:
Duke Terrell and Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duke v. Wyeth et al
as 0:2008cv00529
Plaintiff:
Thekla E Duke
Defendant:
Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Slupkowski v. United States of America et al
as 0:2008cv00458
Petitioner:
Stanley A. Slupkowski
Respondent:
United States of America and Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Terrell
as 0:2008cv00197
Petitioner:
Charles A. Brown
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Villegas v. Terrell
as 0:2008cv00176
Petitioner:
Victor Villegas
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chao v. Bergen et al
as 0:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
Elaine L Chao
Defendant:
Sheila A. Bergen, Duke's Body Shop, Inc. and Duke's Body Shop Simple IRA Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Williams v. Mildner et al
as 0:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
Arthur Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Mildner, Kori Theissen, Mark Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
