Cases 51 - 60 of 386
Bogan v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00953
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Bogan
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Patty v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00930
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Earl Patty
Chavers v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00889
Plaintiff:
Clarence Earl Chavers
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thornton v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00892
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Thornton
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Curry v. Settlemires et al
as 3:2019cv00251
Petitioner:
Willie Earl Curry
Respondent:
Roger Settlemires and Attorney General Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00824
Plaintiff:
William Earl Jackson
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Fields v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2019cv00822
Plaintiff:
Brandon Earl Fields
Defendant:
Bryan Matthews, Gulfport Police Dept, State of Mississippi and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. BP Exploration & Propduction et al
as 1:2019cv00794
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production and BP America Production Company
Plaintiff:
William Earl Jackson, Jr.
Harper, Jr. v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00782
Plaintiff:
James Earl Harper, Jr.
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Ellis v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Uknown Gills, Connie Pierce, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
