Cases 51 - 60 of 5,290
RICE v. SMITHCO ENGINEERING INC. et al
as 2:2011cv64227
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND RICE
Defendant:
SMITHCO ENGINEERING INC. , INGERSOLL RAND COMPANY, METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION and others
Movant:
NIDEC MOTER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warner v. Barrilla
as 3:2011cv00522
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Emerson Warner, Sr.
Defendant:
David Barrilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Lewis
as 3:2011cv00523
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Emerson Warner, Sr.
Defendant:
Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBER v. FLOWSERVE US INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01549
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. WEBER
Defendant:
FLOWSERVE US INC., ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY , BLACKMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMERSON v. SEPCO CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv62415
Plaintiff:
JEWELL O EMERSON
Defendant:
SEPCO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMERSON et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62127
Plaintiff:
FLORINE EMERSON and MARVIN EMERSON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMERSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00544
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. EMERSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51138
Plaintiff:
EMERSON C WALKER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HANCOCK v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2010cv78976
Plaintiff:
MABLE LENELL HANCOCK
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. , A. M. LOCKETT & CO., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANCOCK v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2010cv78980
Plaintiff:
MABLE LENELL HANCOCK
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. , A. M. LOCKETT & CO., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
