Cases 51 - 60 of 645
Bedgood v. Warden, FCC Coleman Medium
as 8:2020cv00395
Petitioner:
Johnny Curtis Bedgood
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCC Coleman Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carroll v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2019cv00604
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Complex Coleman-Medium, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Medical Department at FCC Coleman-Medium
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Campbell v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2019cv00592
Petitioner:
Charles Melvin Campbell, Jr
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2019cv00584
Petitioner:
Chares Melvin Campbell, Jr and Charles Melvin Campbell, Jr
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pritchard v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2019cv00552
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Petitioner:
Derrek Lamar Pritchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez-Miranda v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2019cv00535
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Petitioner:
Jose Mauel Hernandez-Miranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cray v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2019cv00533
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Petitioner:
Antwan R. Cray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Austin v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2019cv00179
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Petitioner:
Cedric Emanuel Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carroll v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2019cv00562
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Medical Department at FCC Coleman-Medium
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2019cv00132
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Petitioner:
Alexis Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
