Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Walters v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01051
Plaintiff:
Misty Walters
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation , FedEx Express, Inc. , FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01019
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walters
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, FedEx Express, Inc., FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Cruz et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01729
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Steven Shelton
Plaintiff:
Aden De La Cruz and De La Cruz Delivery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Express Corporation et al v. Robrad, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv02152
Plaintiff:
Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Defendant:
Robrad, LLC and Bradley T Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
T.L.P.S., Inc. et al v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Danny Carson and T.L.P.S., Inc.
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Alvin Paul et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00258
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Jason Gonzales
Plaintiff:
Alvin Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
