Cases 51 - 60 of 79
LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv01397
Plaintiff:
LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD , PETER ACKERMAN , GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FIELDS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01045
Plaintiff:
RONA M. FIELDS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv00961
Plaintiff:
LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD , PETER ACKERMAN , GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FIELDS v. HARRIS
as 1:2015cv00560
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS et al v. JEWELL et al
as 1:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS and BUFFALO FIELD CAMPAIGN
Defendant:
SALLY JEWELL and TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
FIELDS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2014cv01629
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY KEVIN FIELDS
Defendant:
WILLIAM SMITH , ISSAC FULLWOOD and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBBINS et al v. CASTRO et al
as 1:2014cv01521
Plaintiff:
IVA ROBBINS and IVAN ROBBINS
Defendant:
JULIAN CASTRO and HUD FIELD OPERATIONS PUBLIC HOUSING REVITALIZATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
GRAHAM v. NORRINGTON et al
as 1:2013cv01164
Plaintiff:
RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
ROBERT N. NORRINGTON, HUD DC FIELD OFFICE, VIVIAN CARDULLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIELDS v. OJEYEMI
as 1:2012cv01896
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. FIELDS
Defendant:
OJEDAPO OJEYEMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
