Cases 51 - 60 of 289
Stott v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2023cv11189
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Stott
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Smith v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv11175
Plaintiff:
Randy A Smith
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Brown v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10085
Plaintiff:
Demarko Brown
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, Marriott International Inc., Renaissance Center Management Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Younger-Dean v. GM Subsystems Manufacturing, LLC
as 2:2023cv10076
Plaintiff:
David Younger-Dean
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and GM Subsystems Manufacturing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Aula v. ARC Automotive, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv12738
Plaintiff:
Steven M Aula
Defendant:
ARC Automotive, Inc, Gosei North America, Inc., General Motors Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Miller v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2022cv12739
Plaintiff:
Jason Miller
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Justice v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2022cv12239
Plaintiff:
Theodore Justice
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Johnson v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2022cv11548
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Johnson
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv11488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Neo Wireless LLC v. General Motors Company et al
as 2:2022cv11407
Plaintiff:
Neo Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
General Motors Company and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
