Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Gonzalez-Jose v. USA
as 3:2013cv07326
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Gonzalez-Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzalez v. Detective Palmiter et al
as 4:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Oscar Umar Gonzalez
Defendant:
Detective Palmiter, Mike Staples, Joe W. Castlen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dixie Gomez , Florentino Gomez-Gonzalez , Lechia Daniel and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mitchell et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell , Donna Shepard Mitchell , Calogero Gambino and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Gonzalez v. USA
as 6:2013cv00016
Petitioner:
Alejandro J. Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pacer Health Corporation et al v. Anand et al
as 5:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Pacer Health Corporation , Rainier Gonzalez and John Chi
Defendant:
Ashwini Anand and Satyabrata Chatterjee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gonzalez-Jose v. USA
as 3:2012cv07241
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Gonzalez-Mejia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00106
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Sierra et al
as 3:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Juan Diego Gonzalez Sierra and Maria Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gonzalez-Valasquez v. Grouse
as 5:2011cv00214
Plaintiff:
Henry Gonzalez-Valasquez
Defendant:
Michael Growse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
