Cases 51 - 60 of 189
WASHINGTON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY et al
as 1:2019cv00241
Defendant:
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, CO MCKOY, DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE ALEXANDER WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilcox v. Voices of Faith Ministry, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Gary Hawkins and Voices of Faith Ministry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Valeria Wilcox
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hawkins v. Perry
as 1:2019cv04413
Petitioner:
Orlando Lamar Hawkins
Respondent:
C. Perry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETERSON v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2019cv00373
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER, CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD, WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN and others
Petitioner:
JOE W PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAWKINS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2019cv00138
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
DONNA HAWKINS
Not Yet Classified:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hawkins v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Allison Lee Hawkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration, General Counsel/Social Security Administration, Social Security regional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hall v. Beazer Homes, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01401
Plaintiff:
Anise Hall and Anise Hawkins
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Beazer Homes USA, Inc. and Beazer Homes, LLC
Penning v. Intrinsic Tel LLC et al
as 1:2019mi00061
Defendant:
Kerry Reddick, Envision Investments LLC, Earnest Earvin, III and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Penning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Hawkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jamech Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
