Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Funari v. Maynard et al
as 1:2009cv02667
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Funari, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, J. Michael Stouffer, Felicia Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 8:2009cv02621
Plaintiff:
Stella Hinton
Defendant:
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company and Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Boley v. Hinton et al
as 1:2009cv00406
Petitioner:
Bernard Boley, IV
Respondent:
Felicia Hinton and Douglas F. Gansler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hinton v. Rudasill
as 8:2008cv01460
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Hinton
Defendant:
James W. Rudasill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hinton v. Astrue
as 8:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Kenja Hinton
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Hinton et al
as 1:2007cv00751
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Miller
Defendant:
Hinton, Correctional Medical Service, Correctional Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Hinton et al
as 8:2007cv00740
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Howard
Defendant:
Felicia Hinton and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. DPSCS (DOC) et al
as 8:2007cv00611
Plaintiff:
Dana Howard
Defendant:
DPSCS (DOC), C., Medical Staff and others
Consol Defendant:
Felicia Hinton and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
