Cases 51 - 60 of 303
Martin Canty v. Frederick Head, et al
as 17-15132
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN CANTY
Respondent - Appellee:
FREDERICK J. HEAD, Warden and HOMER BRYSON
Glenn v. Johnson State Prison et al
as 3:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn
Defendant:
Johnson State Prison, K. Williams, Wicker Humphries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARD, et al v. DOE et al
as 5:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN W CARD, DARREN LAMOTTE, LEVI ARTHUR FEDD and others
Defendant:
John Doe, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, CORRECTIONAL DOCTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Sanks et al
as 4:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Roland Jones, Keith Sade, Jason Ellis and others
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Nathan Brooks, Robin Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond-Bey v. Bryson
as 1:2017cv03899
Petitioner:
Andrew Dennis Hammond-Bey, Jr.
Respondent:
Homer Bryson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHAFFER v. PHILBIN et al
as 1:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE WILLARD SHAFFER, JR
Defendant:
EDWARD PHILBIN, JERRY JEFFERSON, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Dozier et al
as 6:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Clark
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 17-14209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON and others
Edgar Quintanilla v. Otis Stanton, et al
as 17-14141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDGAR QUINTANILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
OTIS STANTON, In his individual and official capacity, DOUG WILLIAMS, In his individual and official capacity, ERIC SMOKES, Tier II Unit Manager, in his individual and official capacity and others
Waseem Daker v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 17-14066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, Commissioner, BRIAN OWENS, Former Commissioner, TIMOTHY WARD, Assistant Commissioner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
