Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Anthony v. Kivell, Rayment & Francis et al
as 4:2013cv00527
Plaintiff:
Phillip D Anthony
Defendant:
Kivell, Rayment & Francis and Jason Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollins v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2012cv00921
Plaintiff:
Arveda Rollins
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of , Christy Howell and Mary Clifton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howell v. United States
as 5:2012cv00831
Plaintiff:
William Howell
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Marshall County Board of County Commissioners v. Homesales, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
Marshall County Board of County Commissioners
Defendant:
Homesales, Inc. , JPMorgan Chase Bank and Jason L. Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howell v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Terry L Howell
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Murray County Board of County Commissioners et al v. Homesales, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
Murray County Board of County Commissioners , Johnston County Board of County Commissioners and Marshall County Board of County Commissioners
Defendant:
Homesales, Inc. , JP Morgan Chase Bank , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCormick et al v. Halliburton Company et al
as 5:2011cv01272
Plaintiff:
Mitchell McCormick , Sonja McCormick , Dwight Sanford and others
Defendant:
Halliburton Company and Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Howell v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00327
Plaintiff:
Craig A Howell
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Howell v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kelly Sawyer Howell
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Howell v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
Patricia A Howell
Defendant:
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
