Cases 51 - 60 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HIGGINS v. MOSS et al
as 2:2010cv03023
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH W. HIGGINS
Defendant:
HASAN SANDER, SHIRL SMITH, STEPHEN J. BERSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANG et al v. TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2010cv02564
Plaintiff:
NILES LANG and SONJA KEITH
Defendant:
TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP , TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP ENGINEER , CHARLES ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
ABULKHAIR v. BUSH et al
as 2:2008cv05410
Plaintiff:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ENGEL et al v. MUKASEY et al
as 3:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
HAMZA ENGEL and REEM AL-HOMOUD
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SMART v. TOWNSHIP OF BERLIN et al
as 1:2007cv06103
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF BERLIN, MICHAEL HAYDEN, STEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATEL v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2007cv05819
Plaintiff:
JIGNESH PRANJIVAN PATEL
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
AQEL v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2007cv05816
Plaintiff:
AMAL ALI AQEL
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
SMYRNOVA v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2007cv05818
Plaintiff:
OLGA SMYRNOVA
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
